§ 72.8. Liability for violations.
725 words·~3 min read·
/us/cfr/t28/s§ 72.8·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
(a)Criminal liability---(1) Offense.
(i)A sex offender may be liable to criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. 2250(a) if the sex offender---
(A)Is required to register under SORNA; (B)(1) Is a sex offender as defined for the purposes of SORNA by reason of a conviction under Federal law (including the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the law of the District of Columbia, Indian tribal law, or the law of any territory or possession of the United States; or
(2)Travels in interstate or foreign commerce, or enters or leaves, or resides in, Indian country; and
(C)Knowingly fails to register or update a registration as required by SORNA.
(ii)A sex offender may be liable to criminal penalties under 18 U.S.C. 2250(b) if the sex offender---
(A)Is required to register under SORNA;
(B)Knowingly fails to provide information required by SORNA relating to intended travel in foreign commerce; and
(C)Engages or attempts to engage in the intended travel in foreign commerce.
(iii)As a condition of liability under 18 U.S.C. 2250(a)-(b) for failing to comply with a requirement of SORNA, a sex offender must have been aware of the requirement he is charged with violating, but need not have been aware that the requirement is imposed by SORNA.
(2)Defense. A sex offender may have an affirmative defense to liability, as provided in 18 U.S.C. 2250(c), if uncontrollable circumstances prevented the sex offender from complying with SORNA, where the sex offender did not contribute to the creation of those circumstances in reckless disregard of the requirement to comply and complied as soon as the circumstances preventing compliance ceased to exist. Example 1 to paragraph (a)(2). A sex offender changes residence from one jurisdiction to another, bringing into play SORNA's requirement to register in each jurisdiction where the sex offender resides and SORNA's requirement to appear in person and report changes of residence within three business days. See 34 U.S.C. 20913(a), (c). The sex offender attempts to comply with these requirements by contacting the local sheriff's office, which is responsible for sex offender registration in the destination jurisdiction. The sheriff's office advises that it cannot schedule an appointment for him to register within three business days but that he should come by in a week. The sex offender would have a defense to liability if he appeared at the sheriff's office at the appointed time and registered as required. The sex offender's temporary inability to register and inability to report the change of residence within three business days in the new residence jurisdiction was due to a circumstance beyond his control---the sheriff office's refusal to meet with him until a week had passed---and he complied with the requirement to register as soon as the circumstance preventing compliance ceased to exist. Example 2 to paragraph (a)(2). A sex offender cannot register in a state in which he resides because its registration authorities will not register offenders on the basis of the offense for which the sex offender was convicted. The sex offender would have a defense to liability because the state's unwillingness to register sex offenders like him is a circumstance beyond his control. However, if the sex offender failed to register after becoming aware of a change in state policy or practice allowing his registration, the 18 U.S.C. 2250(c) defense would no longer apply, because in such a case the circumstance preventing compliance with the registration requirement would no longer exist. Example 3 to paragraph (a)(2). A sex offender needs to travel to a foreign country on short notice---less than 21 days---because of an unforeseeable family or work emergency. The sex offender would have a defense to liability for failing to report the intended travel 21 days in advance, as required by § 72.7(f), because it is impossible to report an intention to travel outside the United States before the intention exists. However, if the sex offender failed to inform the registration jurisdiction (albeit on short notice) once he intended to travel, 18 U.S.C. 2250(c) would not excuse that failure, because the preventing circumstance---absence of an intent to travel abroad---would no longer exist.
(b)Supervision condition. For a sex offender convicted of a Federal offense, compliance with SORNA is a mandatory condition of probation, supervised release, and parole. The release of such an offender who does not comply with SORNA may be revoked.
Connectionstraces to 2
Traces to 2 documents
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources